[Home | Mail Archive | Join the mail archive | Photo Gallery ]

Mazda Rotary Pickup Forum
you are logged in as
profile | register | faq | search (active threads) | memberlist
Sponsored by:
Index > @ the Pickup Bed (General Topics) > Thread: Rear Brakes
Thread: Rear Brakes
jfaplanet


Redlining
Posts: 356
posted March 14, 2003 10:53 PM

Rear Brakes

For those of you who want to know. The 84 Mazda B2000 rear brakes have only 2 wheel cylinders. One on each side. The one on the drivers side has a brake line that goes in and one that goes out and over to the passenger side. The only bleeder is on the passenger side. Anyone wanting to upgrade to get rid of 4 wheel cylinders should seriously look at the middle model B series trucks. It is a lot cheaper to rebuild or replace 2 wheel cylinders rather that 4, not to mention availability. Hope this helps at least one of our members, Charles
____________
74 REPU "Red"
74 REPU "Jethro" "TII"
74 RE-Courier vert
79 SA-SE(aka deathtrap)
79 SA-SE-FC (project
turbo)
http://home.bellsouth.net
/p/PWP-crgj
TN Forum:
http://tnrotary.10.forume
r.com/

        Click here to send jfaplanet an ICQ message. Click here to add 1608329 to your ICQ list. Click here to send jfaplanet an AIM message. 
View IP (Administrators only)
Klaus43


Rotorhead
Posts: 1259
posted March 15, 2003 12:00 AM

Upgrade?

Thanks for the info, Charles--but there must be a reason our repu's came with four rear wheel cylinders...? Sure, the newer setup is simpler and easier to fix and bleed, but what might the benefits be of the original pain-in-the-ass setup? There must've been a reason they built 'em that way...

       
View IP (Administrators only)
Jeff20B


Moderator
Posts: 661
posted March 15, 2003 08:51 AM

I think the old Couriers from the same time period as our REPUs had two wheel cylinders on each side in front. I'm not sure about the back. There was a reason. What is the payload capacity of the B series pickups? I bet it's lower than the REPU. Only larger heavier duty trucks had dual wheel cylinders, at least back in the day. Maybe brake tech has come a long way since then?
____________
'74 REPU
'76 Cosmo
'77 MG Midget 13B
'81 RX-7

       
View IP (Administrators only)
Klaus43


Rotorhead
Posts: 1259
posted March 15, 2003 10:28 AM

Hopefully...

...brake tech., and not just make-it-cheaper tech! Sad to say, but all too often that seems to be the case... perhaps justified by not only lesser capacity, but lesser performance stats. in general? Any case, nice that they went heavy-duty on our trucks!

       
View IP (Administrators only)
roaddancer


Hauling
Posts: 127
posted March 16, 2003 09:29 PM

Assuming that you can get the parts, the cost/work involved isn't worth the effort of conversion. I figured the double cyl. bit was to equalize the wear all over the shoes, as well as make a more even contact with the drum. A better system, but more complex for the factory to assemble...and bean counters rule the auto industry!

       
View IP (Administrators only)
All times are PST (US)
Post New Poll   Post New Topic    Post New Reply
Rate Topic:
Powerd By: BlazeBoard

[Home | Mail Archive | Join the mail archive | Photo Gallery ]
0.023036956787109 seconds processing time